In ancient Israel a scapegoat was used to deal with the sins of the people. All of their sins were pronounced on the hapless animal and it was driven away. Do you see any logical problems with this approach? You may smile and roll your eyes thinking this is a foolish ancient ritual, but the term has survived to modern usage. Has the practice survived as well? How many people do you know who can find someone else to blame for all of their problems?
Leo and I just returned from a wonderful time of ministry in the United Kingdom. Hundreds of people were registered for the conference and had driven in from all over the country, so they came hungry and ready to receive! It was an honor to share on dream interpretation as well as the ministry of angels. And then on Sunday morning, the host pastors asked if I would share on how to hear God's voice.
Are you familiar with the story of the wheat and the tares? In the context of the story these refer to individuals who are the children of the Kingdom and the children of the evil one. The workers propose to pull the weeds during the time of growth, but the master decides to wait until harvest for the separation to take place. Could the same concept be applied at a finer scale? Do you have activities in your own life that could be considered wheat, and others that could be considered tares? You don’t have to wait until the end of your life to make the separation.
I said that man does not live by bread alone. At the most basic level you know that you need other types of food, but you know that this is not what I was talking about. Are you aware of your need for emotional nourishment? Spiritual nourishment? You need more than food to survive. I alluded to this when I said that it was not good for the man to be alone. You need human contact. Solitary confinement is considered a cruel punishment. But you need still more. In the passage above I go on to say that you need every word of God.
How do you feel about yourself? How do you feel about yourself when you are around other people? This answer can vary widely depending on who you are with. Some people open the door for you to express your true self, even with your faults and vulnerabilities, and you find contact with them to be life-enhancing. They make you feel good about yourself. Others must prove themselves to be superior at your expense, and you feel exhausted and discouraged from being around them. Reversing the question, how do you make others feel about themselves? How do I make you feel about yourself?
Would you have picked Peter as the most brash and impulsive of my disciples? In story after story he acts quickly and gets corrected for it. Do you identify with him? I told him that he would be sifted like wheat, but that after he was converted he would strengthen his brethren. His faith did not fail, and this came to pass. Can you see how these experiences had a redeeming effect on him? It was not in spite of them but because of them that he was able to lead the church I left behind. Do you see a similar process in effect in your own life?
What is the most revolutionary way to change society? Is it a violent revolution, or is it gradual reform, or is there another way?
Do you think of tribal identity and association only in the context of native peoples? But ancient Israel, known collectively as the one people of God, were divided into tribes. The principle is universal. You could look at the denominations that exist today and consider them as tribes within the overarching faith of Christianity, but the concept goes beyond even that. Have you ever connected with a group of people, even if they were strangers, who joined together over something that you were passionate about? Did this feel like coming home for the first time? Do you know your tribe?
When I said to love your neighbor as yourself, the question came back to me asking, who is my neighbor? I replied with the story of the Good Samaritan. The implied answer is that everyone is your neighbor, especially those with whom you do not agree or consider to be within your circle. How large is your circle? Most people associate with a narrow demographic in terms of race, profession, income, educational level, culture, political and religious persuasions and many other factors. Do you? It is easier than ever before to find those who are like you and associate only with them.
How effectively are you able to limit your circle of contacts to those who are similar to yourself? This is possible now more than ever before. Increased mobility and electronic communications can open you to a broader world, or allow you to find and associate with an ever more narrowly defined community. Do you think that this is beneficial? How often do you have real encounters with those of substantially different beliefs, professions, political opinions, education and income level from yourself? Who would decline the benefits of affluence and technology?
